The Equativ App table marks bundle required, but its parent description strongly recommends App ID or Bundle ID. Missing bundle is advisory while these source requirements conflict.
The Equativ App table marks bundle required, but its parent description strongly recommends App ID or Bundle ID. Missing bundle is advisory while these source requirements conflict.
What it means
The Equativ App table marks bundle required, but its parent description strongly recommends App ID or Bundle ID. Missing bundle is advisory while these source requirements conflict. This check applies to the selected vendor contract and integration direction.
Why it matters
The declared profile checks the published partner contract alongside canonical OpenRTB. It does not verify runtime approval or account configuration.
How to fix it
Review the documented processing behavior or source ambiguity before changing the payload. Confirm account-dependent exceptions with the destination.
Example that trips it
{
"id": "r",
"imp": [
{
"id": "i",
"tagid": "placement",
"banner": {
"w": 300,
"h": 250
}
}
],
"device": {
"ip": "203.0.113.2"
},
"user": {
"buyeruid": "matched-user"
},
"app": {
"publisher": {
"id": "1234"
}
}
}Profile equativ-supplier, OpenRTB 2.6-202606. The fixture asserts openrtb.profile.equativ.app_identity_advisory at app.bundle.
Check your payload
Paste a bid request or response into the tester to see whether this code fires against it, or gate on the id in CI with the CLI: the id is stable, wording is not.
Back to the full diagnostic code reference.